Practiceby Lab 10 Get started ›
Crossfire

Should women plan training around the phase of the menstrual cycle?

What the experts say

Bryan JohnsonNo clinical or scientific credential claimed · technology founder and quantified-self subject

Yes. Train hard in the follicular phase, back off in the luteal phase, and raise protein when you do

What it rests onA hormonal mechanism argument: rising estrogen in the follicular phase improves insulin sensitivity, muscle synthesis and recovery and keeps core temperature lower, so intensity lands better; rising progesterone in the luteal phase raises core temperature, reduces insulin sensitivity and slows recovery, so zone 2 and lighter strength work with protein raised from 1.5 to 2.0 g per kg. The luteal-phase supplement list maps onto products he sells.

Source: protocol.bryanjohnson.com ↗
Stacy T. SimsPhD · exercise physiologist and nutrition scientist

No longer. Decide today's session on readiness, not on the calendar. Cycle awareness stays; cycle prescription goes

What it rests onA dated first-person revision of her own position by the researcher who popularised it: 'I was one of the first to start talking about this, about 7-8 years ago', and 'the more data we collect, the clearer it becomes: there's no single right way for all women to train around their cycles'. Her replacement is 'Train by readiness, not the calendar. If energy, sleep, and HRV look good, great, go for it. If not, modify intensity or focus on technique and recovery.' She keeps the awareness explicitly: 'Cycle awareness is still powerful; it's part of understanding your physiology. But it should guide you, not confine you.'

Source: drstacysims.com ↗

Overview

Sims is addressing women training seriously, including those with anovulatory or irregular cycles, for whom she says the calendar is unreliable in the first place. Johnson is addressing a general adult female reader inside a protocol otherwise written for himself, and he holds no credential in exercise physiology. The dispute is over prescription by phase; neither of them disputes that cycles are worth tracking.

Where they agree

Both hold that female physiology differs materially from male physiology and that training advice built only on male subjects is inadequate. Both endorse tracking the cycle. Both raise protein in the luteal phase.

What would settle it

Well-controlled trials of phase-based programming against readiness-based programming with performance and adherence endpoints. The underlying cycle-phase literature is the same literature Sims's own methodological work argues is usually too poorly controlled to conclude from, which is why she moved.

Practice does not pick a winner here

You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.

Get started

Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.