Shelby HarrisPsyD, DBSM · behavioural sleep medicine psychologist
Yes. Most people have normalised a baseline that is costing them, and naming the cost is what gets them treated
What it rests onSleep is the floor the other pillars stand on; shorter sleep correlates with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety, dementia and all-cause mortality, and patients arrive having accepted years of it as the price of their life stage
Source: drshelbyharris.com ↗
Jade WuPhD, DBSM · behavioural sleep medicine psychologist
Not that way, not to this audience. The fear is part of the disorder
What it rests onPeople with insomnia mostly get roughly adequate sleep, the alarming literature is largely about deprivation rather than insomnia, and long-horizon doom framing acts as a perpetuating factor
Source: drjadewu.com ↗
The positions are aimed at different readers, and that is most of the answer. Harris's stakes framing sits on a page written to get an untreated person to seek care, and her clinical pages then do the opposite for the person already in treatment (sh-3am-normal, sh-daytime-is-the-cost). Wu's caution is aimed at the anxious sleeper who has already read too much. Neither would defend their own framing for the other's reader.
That chronic sleep deficit genuinely damages health: Wu affirms it without hedging in her sleep-debt piece, and Harris's clinical material is as deflationary as Wu's once a patient is in front of her. Both would rather a worried person be assessed than reassured by a website.
Evidence on whether stakes-first sleep content improves care-seeking without worsening outcomes in people prone to sleep anxiety. Walker has already conceded in print that the anxiety effect is real, which makes this a three-way question rather than a two-way one.
You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.
Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.