Practiceby Lab 10 Get started ›
Crossfire

Should I be adding salt to my food, or cutting it?

What the experts say

Stephen D. PhinneyMD, PhD · physician-scientist; co-founder and former Chief Medical Officer, Virta Health

If you are in sustained nutritional ketosis, add it: about 5 grams of sodium a day, and standard low-salt advice becomes actively harmful in that state.

What it rests onHe argues nutritional ketosis increases renal sodium excretion, so sodium needs rise above what standard guidance assumes, and that inadequate sodium in that state drives compensatory aldosterone, cortisol and adrenaline, which people experience as keto flu and mislabel as adrenal fatigue. He cites mortality data on which risk of death rose sharply below 4 g of sodium a day and nearly doubled at 2 g, against a 15 percent increase at 8 g. He carries an explicit carve-out for hypertension, fluid retention and interacting medications (phi-sodium-carveout). Published by the company he co-founded.

Source: virtahealth.com ↗
Gil CarvalhoMD, PhD · nutrition and aging researcher, creator of Nutrition Made Simple!

Cut it. Stop adding salt to food; most Westerners already overconsume sodium.

What it rests onQuoted in full from his newsletter, because the exceptions are the load-bearing part: 'We don´t need to add salt to food. Sodium is an essential nutrient but we need small amounts and it´s present in plants and animal foods. Endurance athletes who lose more sodium through their sweat may benefit by adding more in their drinks or food. Otherwise, most Westerners overconsume sodium (mostly in ultraprocessed foods) and would benefit by cutting back. Bear in mind this varies person to person as some are more salt sensitive than others.' He grants exactly two exceptions, endurance athletes and individual salt sensitivity, and he does not address ketogenic diets at all. No commercial relationship found.

Source: gilcarvalhomdphd.substack.com ↗

Overview

This is the whole dispute. Phinney is addressing people already holding sustained nutritional ketosis, a state in which he says the kidneys handle sodium differently; outside it his own advice would be reckless and he says so. Carvalho is addressing the general Western adult eating a mixed diet dominated by ultraprocessed sodium, and grants exceptions for athletes and salt-sensitive people without considering ketosis.

So they are not quite contradicting each other: Phinney is claiming an exception Carvalho has not ruled on. Michael Greger holds the same pole harder, with a target under 1,500 mg a day.

Where they agree

Both agree sodium is an essential nutrient, that most sodium in a Western diet arrives through ultraprocessed food rather than the salt shaker, that requirements vary between individuals, and that people who lose large amounts through sweat need more. Neither disputes that sodium raises blood pressure in salt-sensitive people.

What would settle it

A sodium-intake trial run inside sustained nutritional ketosis with blood pressure and hard outcomes, which would test Phinney's exception directly and does not currently exist. In the other direction, resolution of the disputed epidemiology below 3 g a day, which is the evidence Phinney's 5 g target leans on and which is itself contested territory.

Practice does not pick a winner here

You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.

Get started

Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.