Beatrice GombergCreator · founder of Tabor Place
Replace it, starting with anything that meets hot water daily
What it rests onProduct testing published in Chemosphere in 2024, plus earlier University of Plymouth work on recycled electrical waste in consumer goods that she cited 18 months before that study appeared.
Source: taborplace.co ↗
Joe SchwarczPhD · chemist, director of the McGill Office for Science and Society
The dose does not support replacing anything
What it rests onRecalculation of the paper's reference dose, 7,000 x 60 = 420,000 rather than 42,000 ng/day, and the standard toxicological framing that only the dose makes the poison.
Source: mcgill.ca ↗
Michelle WongPhD · chemist and science communicator
The genre is the problem, not this product
What it rests onHer published treatise on plastic-free marketing, 21 Jan 2026, arguing from the same dose-and-evidence position she applies to cosmetic ingredient scares.
Source: labmuffin.com ↗
Gomberg is talking primarily to parents of small children, where precaution has a lower bar. Schwarcz is talking about a general adult using a utensil. Wong is talking about consumers being sold replacement products.
All three accept that recycled electronics do end up in black plastic consumer goods, that flame retardants were detected, and that the corrections to the study were real. Gomberg's own tp-notequal post accepts the dose-and-context framework the other two argue from.
A third correction, a retraction, or an independent replication measuring migration from utensils in use rather than concentration in the polymer. Gomberg's position is unlikely to move on this paper alone, because she held it before the paper existed.
You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.
Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.