David A. SinclairPhD · Professor of Genetics, Harvard Medical School
Still defends it
What it rests onHis own 2003 work and subsequent research, plus a formulation argument about fat solubility.
Source: lifespanpodcast.com ↗
David A. SinclairPhD · Professor of Genetics, Harvard Medical School
Still defends it
What it rests onHis own 2003 work and subsequent research, plus a formulation argument about fat solubility.
Source: lifespanpodcast.com ↗
Matt KaeberleinPhD · biogerontologist
Calls it a myth
What it rests onA failed replication in his own laboratory, and the subsequent history of the compound in human trials.
Source: podcasters.spotify.com ↗
Neither is talking about a specific population. This is a dispute about whether a molecule does what one of them said it does, and who is asking barely changes the answer.
Both accept that the Sirtris programme failed and that SRT501 was discontinued. They disagree about what that failure was a failure of.
Little would, which is worth saying out loud rather than pretending the question is live. This is a twenty-year-old dispute with a commercial history, a failed drug programme and a failed replication behind it. The honest framing is that one of these two is describing a scientific consensus and the other is describing his own position within it.
You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.
Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.