Martin J. GibalaPhD · exercise physiologist, McMaster University
Harder. At three to six hours a week, Zone 2 is not a hard enough stimulus to accrue benefits efficiently, and putting 80 percent of a small weekly budget there leaves you less fit than you could be.
What it rests onA narrative review he co-authored argues the Zone 2 recommendation rests on observational data from elite endurance athletes doing very large volumes, that it contradicts substantial evidence for high-intensity exercise on mitochondrial capacity and cardiometabolic health, and that prioritising intensities above Zone 2 matters particularly at lower training volumes. He adds that Zone 2 has no uniform definition and that consumer wearables bound it differently from one another.
Source: realexercisescience.com ↗
