Practiceby Lab 10 Get started ›
Crossfire

How much salt should you eat?

What the experts say

Judy ChoBCHN, FNTP · board-certified holistic nutritionist and functional nutritional therapy practitioner; no clinical licence recorded

More than you think. Roughly 1 to 3 teaspoons of salt a day, titrated by energy and swelling, and more again if you eat meat-based or ketogenic.

What it rests onHer stated grounds: a pound of meat carries only about 400 mg of sodium, so a meat-based diet undersupplies it; below about 500 mg of sodium a day she says you risk insulin resistance and rising aldosterone; chloride is needed to make stomach acid; and she cites work showing higher risk of heart disease and premature death below 3 g of sodium a day than at 4 to 5 g. She publishes a titration rule (start at 1 teaspoon, find the level that gives more energy without swelling) and gives 2 to 5 teaspoons as what meat-based and ketogenic eaters typically use. The insulin-resistance argument is sourced on the page to her own book, which could not be read.

Source: nutritionwithjudy.com ↗
Michael GregerMD · founder, NutritionFacts.org

Less. Cut about half a teaspoon of salt a day, and aim under the guideline targets.

What it rests onHe cites modelling in which cutting salt intake by half a teaspoon a day 'might prevent 22% of stroke deaths, and 16% of fatal heart attacks', and reports the US Dietary Guidelines target of under 2,300 mg a day and the American Heart Association's under 1,500 mg. His practical argument is structural rather than individual: about 75 percent of dietary salt comes from processed food, which he says makes the individual salt-shaker approach impractical, and among adults aged 20 to 50 the largest single source is chicken.

Source: nutritionfacts.org ↗
Dariush MozaffarianMD, DrPH · cardiologist and nutrition epidemiologist, Tufts

No more than about 2,000 mg of sodium a day. Most of it is added by manufacturers before food reaches a kitchen, so this is a reformulation problem as much as a personal one.

What it rests onHis dietary priorities table lists sodium in the consume-less column at no more than 2000 mg/d, and his comparative risk assessment makes high sodium the largest of ten dietary factors, associated with an estimated 9.5 percent of US cardiometabolic deaths. He is not claiming the number is settled: his own concordance table in the same review files the harms of HIGH sodium under broad concordance but the harms of MODERATE sodium one column over, under general concordance with some remaining controversy.

Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
Stephen D. PhinneyMD, PhD · physician-scientist; co-founder and former Chief Medical Officer, Virta Health

While you are in sustained nutritional ketosis, take in about 5 grams of sodium a day, roughly 3 from food and 2 from broth or bouillon.

What it rests onHe argues that nutritional ketosis raises renal sodium excretion, so sodium needs rise above what standard low-salt guidance assumes, and that the resulting depletion drives the compensatory hormonal response people call keto flu. He states an explicit carve-out in the same article: people with high blood pressure or fluid retention that persists after keto-adaptation, particularly on a diuretic, should not go above 3 grams a day until those are resolved.

Source: virtahealth.com ↗

Overview

Who each is talking to is most of this disagreement. Greger and Mozaffarian are both addressing the general public eating a processed-food diet, where roughly three quarters of the sodium arrives in food nobody salted at home; that is the fact both of their numbers rest on, and neither mentions low-carbohydrate or ketogenic eaters.

Cho and Phinney are addressing people who have already removed that supply, Cho by eating meat and water, which is why she opens with the 400 mg per pound figure, and Phinney by being in sustained nutritional ketosis, a state he argues raises renal sodium losses. Phinney excludes people with high blood pressure or persistent fluid retention by name, particularly on a diuretic.

Read as a straight contradiction this misrepresents all four. What they really disagree about is what happens to someone who cuts out processed food, and only two of them have addressed that person.

Where they agree

All four hold that in an ordinary Western diet most sodium arrives through processed food rather than the salt shaker, and none of them is arguing about table salt at the margin.

All four treat the requirement as conditional rather than universal: Greger's own material notes that scientists are still actively arguing about population-wide targets, Mozaffarian's concordance table files the harms of high sodium under broad concordance and the harms of moderate sodium one column over as still contested, and Cho and Phinney both publish a titration rule rather than a fixed number. Both of the higher numbers come with a stop condition on blood pressure and fluid retention.

What would settle it

Trial data on sodium intake and cardiovascular outcomes in people eating a low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diet, which is the population where these positions actually collide and where none of the four has any. That would move Cho and Phinney if it went against them, and would tell Greger and Mozaffarian whether they have a real exception on their hands.

Failing that, replication of the J-shaped association below 3 g a day in a cohort not confounded by reverse causation from existing illness, which is the load-bearing citation on the higher side; and for Mozaffarian, trial evidence on hard endpoints at moderate intakes, which is the gap his own concordance table concedes.

Practice does not pick a winner here

You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.

Get started

Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.