Practiceby Lab 10 Get started ›
Crossfire

How much protein should I eat?

What the experts say

Jason FungMD · nephrologist, Scarborough Health Network, Toronto (CPSO #70179, independent practice since 29 May 2001)

Less than you think, and less again while losing weight

What it rests onThe WHO derivation: measured obligatory nitrogen losses average 0.61 g/kg/day, and the familiar 0.8 g/kg RDA is that plus two standard deviations to cover 97.5 per cent of people. Plus his argument that excess protein is converted to glucose, and his clinical observation that patients losing over 100 pounds on his protocol did not need skin removal.

Source: thefastingmethod.com ↗
Gabrielle LyonDO · osteopathic physician, muscle-centric medicine

Much more, at every age

What it rests onMuscle protein synthesis and sarcopenia literature; skeletal muscle framed as the organ of longevity.

Valter LongoPhD · biogerontologist, Professor of Gerontology, USC

Low through midlife, then raise it after 65

What it rests onNHANES III cohort with 18-year follow-up plus mouse tumour experiments; mechanism is the GH/IGF-1 axis.

Dr. Daniel PompaD.C. (Life University, 1995) · not a physician, no active licence · health educator and programme founder

Moderate, and more is worse

What it rests onExcess protein converts to glucose via gluconeogenesis, spikes blood sugar and drives advanced glycation end products, which he says age you visibly

Source: drpompa.com ↗
Layne NortonPhD · nutrition scientist, coach, and competitive powerlifter

Substantially higher

What it rests onMuscle protein synthesis and body-composition literature

Overview

Five answers to what looks like one question. Fung's number is for an adult at or above a healthy weight who is trying to lose, and he explicitly excludes bodybuilding, pregnancy, breastfeeding and childhood from it. Pompa is writing about visible ageing in a general adult reader.

Lyon and Norton are usually writing about people who train, Lyon specifically about adults over 50 losing muscle, and her number rises rather than falls with age. Longo's inverts at roughly 65. Fung is the only one whose number falls while you are losing weight, and with Pompa one of only two who does not raise it for older adults, which is the population where the gap is widest and where the sarcopenia evidence pushes hardest against them. Your age and whether you train decide which of these numbers is addressed to you.

Where they agree

Fung, Longo and Pompa agree on the direction and disagree only on the number, all landing well below the high-protein side, and all three reason from a metabolic mechanism rather than from muscle. Fung, Lyon and Longo all accept that protein requirements rise in growth, pregnancy and deliberate muscle building. Pompa, Norton and Lyon all treat protein quality and distribution across the day as mattering, and none of them recommends the low end for someone recovering from illness or injury.

Nobody here disputes that resistance training is the primary lever on muscle mass; they dispute whether protein is a second lever or a permissive condition.

What would settle it

A randomised trial of protein intake with hard functional endpoints (grip strength, falls, independence) in midlife and older adults, which does not exist for any of these positions. For Fung specifically, the falsifiable piece is his claim that weight loss lowers the requirement: a trial of lean mass retention at 0.6 against 1.6 g/kg during equivalent weight loss would settle it, and the existing literature already leans against him there.

For Pompa, a controlled trial in untrained midlife adults measuring both glycation markers and lean mass at those same two intakes would move him, and nothing short of it will.

Practice does not pick a winner here

You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.

Get started

Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.