Practiceby Lab 10 Get started ›
Crossfire

Can you change your chronotype, or do you have to live with it?

What the experts say

Michael J. BreusPhD · clinical psychologist (NPPES taxonomy 103TC0700X, Arizona licence 3760, record last updated 26 Nov 2012) · Diplomate of the American Board of Sleep Medicine, specialty Psychology, certified 17 Apr 2000, a lifetime credential with no expiry and no recertification · stated Fellowship of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, a voluntary association, not verified

You cannot. It is genetic, and retraining it is next to impossible.

What it rests onHe separates chronotype from circadian rhythm explicitly and puts the lever on only one of them: circadian rhythm can be retrained, and he gives night-shift adaptation with bright light and blackout curtains as the worked example, but 'Unlike circadian rhythm, your chronotype is influenced by genetics, not light or other environmental factors', naming PER3 and shorter alleles, and 'deliberately changing or retraining your chronotype is next to impossible'. The same paragraph concedes that 'your chronotype may evolve over the course of your life', which belongs with the claim. His 2026 page states the position more firmly still, as 'Your genetic, pre-determined sleep schedule', with no new evidence cited.

Source: sleepdoctor.com ↗
Jade WuPhD, DBSM · behavioural sleep medicine psychologist

You can shift it, and here is how.

What it rests onShe argues chronotype is 'determined by our genes, age, environment, and behaviors' and 'shifts across our lifetime', that night owls are not lazy, and that research linking late chronotypes to poor health mostly reflects the damage of forcing a late chronotype into an early world rather than anything wrong with the chronotype itself. Her practical instruction is the lever Breus says does not exist: if you are 'a night owl with morning obligations, you can shift your chronotype by consistently getting up at the same time every morning (including weekends!) and getting bright light exposure as early as possible upon waking'.

Source: drjadewu.com ↗

Overview

Both are addressing general adults, and neither is talking about shift workers, for whom Wu routes to a specialist and Breus's four schedules do not apply. The population that this disagreement actually decides something for is narrow and identifiable: a late chronotype with early obligations.

On Breus's account that person should stop fighting and move the obligations. On Wu's account that person has a documented lever and should use it before rearranging their life.

Where they agree

Larger than the dispute, and worth reading first. Both hold that chronotype is real and substantially heritable. Both hold that night owls are not lazy or undisciplined.

Both give the SAME closing instruction in almost the same words: Breus writes 'Remember to work with your chronotype, not against it!' and Wu recommends working with your natural chronotype rather than against it whenever possible. Both anchor the practice to a consistent rise time. Your action tomorrow morning is the same either way.

What would settle it

A trial in late chronotypes randomising a fixed early rise time plus morning bright light against no intervention, with dim light melatonin onset measured at baseline and follow-up, and long enough to distinguish a persistent phase shift from a maintained one.

Wu's claim implies a shift; Breus's implies you can hold a schedule but not move the underlying clock, which is a difference an outcome measure could resolve. Neither source cites a trial of that design.

Practice does not pick a winner here

You do, and your call is dated, kept, and yours to change. Follow the people you already trust and what they publish turns into a short daily practice.

Get started

Free to sign up and use. We do not ask for a card.